On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:43:54 +0000, Luke Hart wrote: > AGG is currently much more efficient than Cairo (my simple tests > indicated getting on for an order of magnitude), so may well be better > in the short term. Could you provide some of those tests to the cairo community, (or even just point them out to me here, or privately). There was a Mozilla-sponsored Summer of Code project last year to implement an AGG backend for cairo---with the hope being that any performance benefit that AGG has could become part of cairo itself. That backend did become functional, but the timings suggested it wasn't significantly faster than the software in cairo that it was replacing. So I'm curious to see why you came up with such different results in your comparison. -Carl
Attachment:
pgp0ZrSJOXcnc.pgp
Description: PGP signature